Here is a clear, factual explanation of both:
✅ History of the Taj Mahal (Accepted by Historians)
The Taj Mahal is a UNESCO World Heritage Site in Agra, India. It was built by the Mughal emperor Shah Jahan in memory of his wife Mumtaz Mahal, who died in 1631.
✔ Key Historical Facts
- Construction period: 1632–1653
- Built by: Shah Jahan (Mughal Empire)
- Purpose: Mausoleum for Mumtaz Mahal
- Architectural style: Mughal architecture (Persian, Indian, Islamic blend)
- Historical records:
- Mughal court documents (Badshahnama)
- Records of travelers
- Persian inscriptions inside the building
- Payroll accounts of workers
- Architect names (Ustad Ahmad Lahori commonly credited)
Archaeological and historical evidence strongly supports that it was built in the 17th century by the Mughals.
❓ Tejo Mahalaya Theory (Not Accepted by Historians)
Tejo Mahalaya is a modern claim promoted by some writers, mainly P.N. Oak, suggesting that the Taj Mahal was originally a Hindu temple dedicated to Lord Shiva.
✘ Why scholars reject this theory
- No archaeological evidence of a Shiva temple beneath the Taj Mahal.
- Mughal records clearly document the construction process.
- Inscriptions inside the Taj Mahal mention Shah Jahan.
- ASI (Archaeological Survey of India) has repeatedly confirmed it is a Mughal structure.
- No historical document before the 20th century mentions a “Tejo Mahalaya.”
✓ Courts have also ruled
Indian courts (including the Allahabad High Court and Supreme Court) have stated that the Taj Mahal’s origin as a Mughal monument is well-established and the Tejo Mahalaya claim has no historical proof.
🔍 Summary
| Topic | Taj Mahal | Tejo Mahalaya |
|---|---|---|
| Origin | Mughal construction (1632–1653) | Temple theory proposed in 20th century |
| Evidence | Extensive historical + archaeological records | No verified evidence |
| Accepted by historians | ✔ Yes | ✘ No |
If you want, I can also give you:
✅ A simple explanation in Hindi
✅ A detailed timeline of Taj Mahal construction
✅ Evidence comparison between the two
.jpeg)
.jpeg)
No comments:
Post a Comment